Canada vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Canada
3.90 billion
in 2025
Denmark
4.71 billion
in 2025
Canada rank
12th
Denmark rank
10th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Canada
  • Denmark
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B199920122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 4.71 billion against 3.90 billion in Canada, a difference of 813.57 million.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 12th and Denmark ranks 10th of 91 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 2.27 billion 579.09 million 1.69 billion Canada
2010s 3.25 billion 911.87 million 2.33 billion Canada
2020s 4.22 billion 2.89 billion 1.33 billion Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Canada or Denmark?
Denmark, at 4.71 billion against 3.90 billion in Canada as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Canada and Denmark?
813.57 million, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Denmark?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Canada and Denmark rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Canada ranks 12th and Denmark ranks 10th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/canada/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/canada/denmark/">Canada vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.