Denmark vs India: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
4.71 billion
in 2025
India
4.78 billion
in 2025
Denmark rank
10th
India rank
9th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • India
02.0B4.0B6.0B199920122025

How they compare

India currently reports 4.78 billion against 4.71 billion in Denmark, a difference of 68.05 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was India ahead.

Denmark ranks 10th and India ranks 9th of 91 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark India Difference Ahead
2000s 379.96 million 911.67 million 531.71 million India
2010s 911.87 million 2.21 billion 1.30 billion India
2020s 2.89 billion 4.90 billion 2.01 billion India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or India?
India, at 4.78 billion against 4.71 billion in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and India?
68.05 million, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and India?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Denmark and India rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 10th and India ranks 9th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs India: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/denmark/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/denmark/india/">Denmark vs India: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.