Georgia vs Ukraine: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Georgia
29,839
in 2025
Ukraine
330,000
in 2025
Georgia rank
83rd
Ukraine rank
80th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Georgia
  • Ukraine
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200220132025

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 330,000 against 29,839 in Georgia, a difference of 300,161.

That makes Ukraine's figure about 11.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 83rd and Ukraine ranks 80th of 91 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 15,627 21,667 6,039 Ukraine
2010s 19,477 103,000 83,523 Ukraine
2020s 29,726 328,333 298,607 Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Georgia or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 330,000 against 29,839 in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Georgia and Ukraine?
300,161, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Ukraine?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Ukraine rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Georgia ranks 83rd and Ukraine ranks 80th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Ukraine: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/georgia/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/georgia/ukraine/">Georgia vs Ukraine: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.