Iceland vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Iceland
96.03 million
in 2025
Latvia
79.90 million
in 2025
Iceland rank
56th
Latvia rank
59th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Iceland
  • Latvia
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M200020122025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 96.03 million against 79.90 million in Latvia, a difference of 16.13 million.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 59th of 91 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 27.13 million 54,000 27.07 million Iceland
2010s 55.62 million 0 55.62 million Iceland
2020s 95.70 million 30.16 million 65.53 million Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Iceland or Latvia?
Iceland, at 96.03 million against 79.90 million in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Iceland and Latvia?
16.13 million, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Latvia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Iceland ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 59th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/iceland/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/iceland/latvia/">Iceland vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.