Latvia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Latvia
79.90 million
in 2025
Malta
69.64 million
in 2025
Latvia rank
59th
Malta rank
62nd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Latvia
  • Malta
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 79.90 million against 69.64 million in Malta, a difference of 10.26 million.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malta ahead.

Latvia ranks 59th and Malta ranks 62nd of 91 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 0 52.00 million 52.00 million Malta
2010s 0 54.30 million 54.30 million Malta
2020s 30.16 million 62.80 million 32.64 million Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Latvia or Malta?
Latvia, at 79.90 million against 69.64 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Latvia and Malta?
10.26 million, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Latvia ranks 59th and Malta ranks 62nd of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/latvia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/latvia/malta/">Latvia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.