Cambodia vs China: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Cambodia
20.16 billion
in 2025
China
20.70 billion
in 2025
Cambodia rank
21st
China rank
19th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Cambodia
  • China
010.0B20.0B30.0B201520202025

How they compare

China currently reports 20.70 billion against 20.16 billion in Cambodia, a difference of 533.00 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was China ahead.

Cambodia ranks 21st and China ranks 19th of 91 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia China Difference Ahead
2010s 12.28 billion 18.87 billion 6.59 billion China
2020s 17.47 billion 14.93 billion 2.53 billion Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Cambodia or China?
China, at 20.70 billion against 20.16 billion in Cambodia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Cambodia and China?
533.00 million, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and China?
10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
How do Cambodia and China rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Cambodia ranks 21st and China ranks 19th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs China: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/cambodia/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/cambodia/china/">Cambodia vs China: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,933 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.