China vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

China
20.70 billion
in 2025
Denmark
23.24 billion
in 2025
China rank
19th
Denmark rank
16th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • China
  • Denmark
020.0B40.0B60.0B199920122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 23.24 billion against 20.70 billion in China, a difference of 2.54 billion.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was China ahead.

China ranks 19th and Denmark ranks 16th of 91 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Denmark Difference Ahead
2010s 18.82 billion 30.38 billion 11.56 billion Denmark
2020s 14.93 billion 42.85 billion 27.92 billion Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, China or Denmark?
Denmark, at 23.24 billion against 20.70 billion in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between China and Denmark?
2.54 billion, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Denmark?
11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
How do China and Denmark rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
China ranks 19th and Denmark ranks 16th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/china/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/china/denmark/">China vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,933 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.