Croatia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Croatia
31.01 million
in 2025
Malta
35.63 million
in 2025
Croatia rank
88th
Malta rank
87th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Croatia
  • Malta
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B200020122025

How they compare

Malta currently reports 35.63 million against 31.01 million in Croatia, a difference of 4.62 million.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 88th and Malta ranks 87th of 91 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 2.64 billion 129.96 million 2.51 billion Croatia
2010s 2.78 billion 43.38 million 2.74 billion Croatia
2020s 3.59 billion 27.47 million 3.57 billion Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Croatia or Malta?
Malta, at 35.63 million against 31.01 million in Croatia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Croatia and Malta?
4.62 million, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Malta?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Malta rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Croatia ranks 88th and Malta ranks 87th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/croatia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/croatia/malta/">Croatia vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,933 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.