Hungary vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Hungary
7.66 billion
in 2025
Serbia
8.08 billion
in 2025
Hungary rank
36th
Serbia rank
34th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Hungary
  • Serbia
05.0B10.0B15.0B200020122025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 8.08 billion against 7.66 billion in Hungary, a difference of 416.98 million.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 34th of 91 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 6.72 billion 4.44 billion 2.28 billion Hungary
2020s 10.43 billion 8.35 billion 2.08 billion Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Hungary or Serbia?
Serbia, at 8.08 billion against 7.66 billion in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Hungary and Serbia?
416.98 million, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Serbia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Hungary and Serbia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Hungary ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 34th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/hungary/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-4/hungary/serbia/">Hungary vs Serbia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) with US Dollars (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorit
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,933 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.