Belarus vs Lithuania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Belarus
5.54 billion
in 2025
Lithuania
5.30 billion
in 2025
Belarus rank
70th
Lithuania rank
71st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Belarus
  • Lithuania
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200420142025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 5.54 billion against 5.30 billion in Lithuania, a difference of 243.01 million.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.

Belarus ranks 70th and Lithuania ranks 71st of 91 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 1.98 billion 5.35 billion 3.38 billion Lithuania
2010s 3.47 billion 5.40 billion 1.93 billion Lithuania
2020s 3.66 billion 4.79 billion 1.13 billion Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Belarus or Lithuania?
Belarus, at 5.54 billion against 5.30 billion in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Belarus and Lithuania?
243.01 million, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lithuania?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Lithuania rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Belarus ranks 70th and Lithuania ranks 71st of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Lithuania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-5/belarus/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-5/belarus/lithuania/">Belarus vs Lithuania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits (in convertible foreign currencies) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,947 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.