Belarus vs Greece: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Belarus
4.22 billion
in 2025
Greece
3.35 billion
in 2025
Belarus rank
65th
Greece rank
68th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Belarus
  • Greece
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B200320142025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 4.22 billion against 3.35 billion in Greece, a difference of 877.20 million.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Greece's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Greece ahead.

Belarus ranks 65th and Greece ranks 68th of 90 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Greece Difference Ahead
2000s 5.18 million 166.67 million 161.48 million Greece
2010s 164.89 million 594.90 million 430.01 million Greece
2020s 1.56 billion 2.94 billion 1.37 billion Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Belarus or Greece?
Belarus, at 4.22 billion against 3.35 billion in Greece as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Belarus and Greece?
877.20 million, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Greece?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Greece rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Belarus ranks 65th and Greece ranks 68th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Greece: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/belarus/greece/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/belarus/greece/">Belarus vs Greece: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,927 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.