Belarus vs Jordan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Belarus
4.22 billion
in 2025
Jordan
4.47 billion
in 2025
Belarus rank
65th
Jordan rank
62nd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Belarus
  • Jordan
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200420142025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 4.47 billion against 4.22 billion in Belarus, a difference of 249.24 million.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 65th and Jordan ranks 62nd of 90 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 7.78 million 3.81 billion 3.80 billion Jordan
2010s 164.89 million 6.30 billion 6.13 billion Jordan
2020s 1.56 billion 4.24 billion 2.68 billion Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Belarus or Jordan?
Jordan, at 4.47 billion against 4.22 billion in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Belarus and Jordan?
249.24 million, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Jordan rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Belarus ranks 65th and Jordan ranks 62nd of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Jordan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/belarus/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/belarus/jordan/">Belarus vs Jordan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,927 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.