Chile vs Romania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Chile
43.97 billion
in 2025
Romania
51.58 billion
in 2025
Chile rank
27th
Romania rank
25th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Chile
  • Romania
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B200020122025

How they compare

Romania currently reports 51.58 billion against 43.97 billion in Chile, a difference of 7.61 billion.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Romania ahead.

Chile ranks 27th and Romania ranks 25th of 90 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 14.80 billion 27.73 billion 12.93 billion Romania
2010s 32.06 billion 29.50 billion 2.57 billion Chile
2020s 38.66 billion 36.66 billion 1.99 billion Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Chile or Romania?
Romania, at 51.58 billion against 43.97 billion in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Chile and Romania?
7.61 billion, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Romania?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Chile and Romania rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Chile ranks 27th and Romania ranks 25th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Romania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/chile/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/chile/romania/">Chile vs Romania: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,927 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.