Czechia vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Czechia
134.07 billion
in 2025
Poland
168.74 billion
in 2025
Czechia rank
16th
Poland rank
13th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Czechia
  • Poland
050.0B100.0B150.0B200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 168.74 billion against 134.07 billion in Czechia, a difference of 34.67 billion.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Czechia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 16th and Poland ranks 13th of 90 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 24.12 billion 34.07 billion 9.95 billion Poland
2010s 56.13 billion 83.38 billion 27.25 billion Poland
2020s 112.43 billion 132.35 billion 19.93 billion Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Czechia or Poland?
Poland, at 168.74 billion against 134.07 billion in Czechia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Czechia and Poland?
34.67 billion, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Poland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Poland rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Czechia ranks 16th and Poland ranks 13th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/czechia/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/czechia/poland/">Czechia vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,927 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.