Jordan vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Jordan
4.47 billion
in 2025
Latvia
4.33 billion
in 2025
Jordan rank
62nd
Latvia rank
63rd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Jordan
  • Latvia
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200020122025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 4.47 billion against 4.33 billion in Latvia, a difference of 138.04 million.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.

Jordan ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 63rd of 90 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.81 billion 4.21 billion 398.29 million Latvia
2010s 6.30 billion 4.01 billion 2.29 billion Jordan
2020s 4.24 billion 4.07 billion 169.20 million Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Jordan or Latvia?
Jordan, at 4.47 billion against 4.33 billion in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Jordan and Latvia?
138.04 million, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Jordan ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 63rd of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/jordan/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-6/jordan/latvia/">Jordan vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, securities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,927 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.