India vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

India
45.17 billion
in 2025
Japan
159.97 billion
in 2025
India rank
4th
Japan rank
1st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • India
  • Japan
050.0B100.0B150.0B200020122025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 159.97 billion against 45.17 billion in India, a difference of 114.80 billion.

That makes Japan's figure about 3.5 times India's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was India ahead.

India ranks 4th and Japan ranks 1st of 89 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 130.91 billion 6.90 billion 124.01 billion India
2010s 107.06 billion 67.03 billion 40.04 billion India
2020s 94.92 billion 146.01 billion 51.10 billion Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, India or Japan?
Japan, at 159.97 billion against 45.17 billion in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between India and Japan?
114.80 billion, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Japan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do India and Japan rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
India ranks 4th and Japan ranks 1st of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/india/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-8/india/japan/">India vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, with Other National Central Banks, BIS and IMF (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
91 places, 1,923 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.