Belarus vs Mongolia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Belarus
382.06 million
in 2025
Mongolia
366.86 million
in 2025
Belarus rank
50th
Mongolia rank
51st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Belarus
  • Mongolia
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B200420142025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 382.06 million against 366.86 million in Mongolia, a difference of 15.19 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 50th and Mongolia ranks 51st of 88 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 3.75 billion 194.02 million 3.55 billion Belarus
2020s 1.25 billion 210.10 million 1.04 billion Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Belarus or Mongolia?
Belarus, at 382.06 million against 366.86 million in Mongolia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Belarus and Mongolia?
15.19 million, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Belarus ranks 50th and Mongolia ranks 51st of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Mongolia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/belarus/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/belarus/mongolia/">Belarus vs Mongolia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,895 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.