Denmark vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
46.86 million
in 2025
Japan
57.00 million
in 2025
Denmark rank
63rd
Japan rank
61st

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Japan
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B100.0B199920122025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 57.00 million against 46.86 million in Denmark, a difference of 10.14 million.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.

Denmark ranks 63rd and Japan ranks 61st of 88 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 15.14 billion 56.07 billion 40.93 billion Japan
2010s 4.33 billion 1.50 billion 2.83 billion Denmark
2020s 90.81 million 74.33 million 16.48 million Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Japan?
Japan, at 57.00 million against 46.86 million in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Japan?
10.14 million, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 63rd and Japan ranks 61st of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/denmark/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/denmark/japan/">Denmark vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,895 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.