Denmark vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
46.86 million
in 2025
Malta
34.85 million
in 2025
Denmark rank
63rd
Malta rank
66th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Malta
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B199920122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 46.86 million against 34.85 million in Malta, a difference of 12.01 million.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 63rd and Malta ranks 66th of 88 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 22.47 billion 128.08 million 22.34 billion Denmark
2010s 4.33 billion 33.13 million 4.30 billion Denmark
2020s 90.81 million 26.12 million 64.69 million Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Malta?
Denmark, at 46.86 million against 34.85 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Malta?
12.01 million, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Malta?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Malta rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 63rd and Malta ranks 66th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/denmark/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/denmark/malta/">Denmark vs Malta: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,895 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.