Latvia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Latvia
30.55 million
in 2025
Norway
30.85 million
in 2025
Latvia rank
68th
Norway rank
67th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Latvia
  • Norway
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B200020122025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 30.85 million against 30.55 million in Latvia, a difference of 303,200.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.

Latvia ranks 68th and Norway ranks 67th of 88 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 148.95 million 984.00 million 835.05 million Norway
2010s 207.29 million 39.60 million 167.69 million Latvia
2020s 34.85 million 24.72 million 10.13 million Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Latvia or Norway?
Norway, at 30.85 million against 30.55 million in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Latvia and Norway?
303,200, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Latvia ranks 68th and Norway ranks 67th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/latvia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/latvia/norway/">Latvia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,895 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.