Latvia vs Sweden: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Latvia
30.55 million
in 2025
Sweden
10.00 million
in 2025
Latvia rank
68th
Sweden rank
69th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Latvia
  • Sweden
01.0B2.0B3.0B200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 30.55 million against 10.00 million in Sweden, a difference of 20.55 million.

That makes Latvia's figure about 3.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.

Latvia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 69th of 88 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 148.95 million 1.57 billion 1.43 billion Sweden
2010s 207.29 million 411.10 million 203.81 million Sweden
2020s 34.85 million 61.33 million 26.48 million Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Latvia or Sweden?
Latvia, at 30.55 million against 10.00 million in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Latvia and Sweden?
20.55 million, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Latvia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 69th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sweden: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/latvia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/latvia/sweden/">Latvia vs Sweden: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,895 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.