Peru vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Peru
15.14 billion
in 2025
Poland
17.70 billion
in 2025
Peru rank
9th
Poland rank
7th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Peru
  • Poland
010.0B20.0B30.0B200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 17.70 billion against 15.14 billion in Peru, a difference of 2.56 billion.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 9th and Poland ranks 7th of 88 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 4.64 billion 6.55 billion 1.91 billion Poland
2010s 14.17 billion 12.66 billion 1.51 billion Peru
2020s 11.73 billion 20.03 billion 8.30 billion Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Peru or Poland?
Poland, at 17.70 billion against 15.14 billion in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Peru and Poland?
2.56 billion, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Peru and Poland rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Peru ranks 9th and Poland ranks 7th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/peru/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-9/peru/poland/">Peru vs Poland: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions outside reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mon
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,895 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.