Belgium vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Belgium
0
in 2025
Denmark
229,693
in 2025
Belgium rank
42nd
Denmark rank
39th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Belgium
  • Denmark
020.0B40.0B60.0B200020122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 229,693 against 0 in Belgium, a difference of 229,693.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 42nd and Denmark ranks 39th of 67 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Denmark in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 5.39 billion 2.22 billion 3.17 billion Belgium
2010s 1.12 billion 393.34 million 723.12 million Belgium
2020s 59.70 million 62.68 million 2.98 million Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Belgium or Denmark?
Denmark, at 229,693 against 0 in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Belgium and Denmark?
229,693, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Denmark?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Denmark rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Belgium ranks 42nd and Denmark ranks 39th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/belgium/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/belgium/denmark/">Belgium vs Denmark: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
69 places, 1,268 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.