Cyprus vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Cyprus
34.78 million
in 2025
Latvia
32.90 million
in 2025
Cyprus rank
27th
Latvia rank
28th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Cyprus
  • Latvia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B200020122025

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 34.78 million against 32.90 million in Latvia, a difference of 1.88 million.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Latvia ahead.

Cyprus ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 28th of 67 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 24.83 million 346.36 million 321.54 million Latvia
2020s 38.90 million 33.24 million 5.66 million Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Cyprus or Latvia?
Cyprus, at 34.78 million against 32.90 million in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Cyprus and Latvia?
1.88 million, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Latvia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and Latvia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Cyprus ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 28th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/cyprus/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/cyprus/latvia/">Cyprus vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
69 places, 1,268 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.