Czechia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Czechia
1.11 million
in 2025
Norway
10.22 million
in 2025
Czechia rank
33rd
Norway rank
30th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Czechia
  • Norway
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200020122025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 10.22 million against 1.11 million in Czechia, a difference of 9.10 million.

That makes Norway's figure about 9.2 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 33rd and Norway ranks 30th of 67 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Norway Difference Ahead
2010s 105.95 million 12.68 million 93.27 million Czechia
2020s 92.10 million 20.28 million 71.82 million Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Czechia or Norway?
Norway, at 10.22 million against 1.11 million in Czechia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Czechia and Norway?
9.10 million, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Norway?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Norway rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Czechia ranks 33rd and Norway ranks 30th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/czechia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/czechia/norway/">Czechia vs Norway: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
69 places, 1,268 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.