Denmark vs Luxembourg: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
229,693
in 2025
Luxembourg
0
in 2025
Denmark rank
39th
Luxembourg rank
42nd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Luxembourg
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B200020122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 229,693 against 0 in Luxembourg, a difference of 229,693.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Denmark ranks 39th and Luxembourg ranks 42nd of 67 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 5.56 billion 4.28 billion 1.27 billion Denmark
2010s 393.34 million 1.73 billion 1.33 billion Luxembourg
2020s 62.68 million 180.67 million 117.99 million Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Luxembourg?
Denmark, at 229,693 against 0 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Luxembourg?
229,693, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Luxembourg?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Luxembourg rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 39th and Luxembourg ranks 42nd of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Luxembourg: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/denmark/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/denmark/luxembourg/">Denmark vs Luxembourg: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
69 places, 1,268 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.