Poland vs Spain: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Poland
7.18 billion
in 2025
Spain
2.46 billion
in 2025
Poland rank
3rd
Spain rank
4th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Poland
  • Spain
05.0B10.0B15.0B200120132025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 7.18 billion against 2.46 billion in Spain, a difference of 4.73 billion.

That makes Poland's figure about 2.9 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Spain ahead.

Poland ranks 3rd and Spain ranks 4th of 67 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Spain Difference Ahead
2000s 37.20 million 3.72 billion 3.68 billion Spain
2010s 2.29 billion 3.55 billion 1.26 billion Spain
2020s 2.10 billion 2.84 billion 738.02 million Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Poland or Spain?
Poland, at 7.18 billion against 2.46 billion in Spain as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Poland and Spain?
4.73 billion, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Spain?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Poland and Spain rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Poland ranks 3rd and Spain ranks 4th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Spain: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/poland/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-other-2/poland/spain/">Poland vs Spain: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Other foreign currency assets, deposits not included in official reserve assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cen
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
69 places, 1,268 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.