Iceland vs South Africa: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Iceland
0
in 2015
South Africa
0
in 2025
Iceland rank
12th
South Africa rank
12th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Iceland
  • South Africa
-400.0M-300.0M-200.0M-100.0M0100.0M200620152025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 against 0 in South Africa, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 12th of 57 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s -190.73 million 48.50 million 239.23 million South Africa
2010s 0 333,333 333,333 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Iceland or South Africa?
Iceland, at 0 against 0 in South Africa as of 2015.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Iceland and South Africa?
0, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Africa?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
How do Iceland and South Africa rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Iceland ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 12th of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs South Africa: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-other/iceland/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-other/iceland/south-africa/">Iceland vs South Africa: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
59 places, 1,080 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.