India vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

India
-115.02 million
in 2023
Lithuania
-256.19 million
in 2024
India rank
42nd
Lithuania rank
44th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • India
  • Lithuania
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B200420142024

How they compare

India currently reports -115.02 million against -256.19 million in Lithuania, a difference of 141.17 million.

Across all 6 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

India ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 44th of 57 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 0 -203.61 million 203.61 million India
2020s 592.49 million -329.78 million 922.27 million India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, India or Lithuania?
India, at -115.02 million against -256.19 million in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between India and Lithuania?
141.17 million, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Lithuania?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do India and Lithuania rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
India ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 44th of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-other/india/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-other/india/lithuania/">India vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
59 places, 1,080 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.