El Salvador vs Guatemala: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

El Salvador
-2.65 billion
in 2025
Guatemala
-2.03 billion
in 2025
El Salvador rank
42nd
Guatemala rank
41st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • El Salvador
  • Guatemala
-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0199520102025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports -2.03 billion against -2.65 billion in El Salvador, a difference of 623.45 million.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 42nd and Guatemala ranks 41st of 90 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s -1.56 billion -613.48 million 949.65 million Guatemala
2010s -1.82 billion -877.41 million 938.60 million Guatemala
2020s -2.76 billion -1.52 billion 1.24 billion Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, El Salvador or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at -2.03 billion against -2.65 billion in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between El Salvador and Guatemala?
623.45 million, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guatemala?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Guatemala rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
El Salvador ranks 42nd and Guatemala ranks 41st of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Guatemala: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/el-salvador/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/el-salvador/guatemala/">El Salvador vs Guatemala: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,913 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.