Estonia vs Guatemala: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Estonia
-1.72 billion
in 2025
Guatemala
-2.03 billion
in 2025
Estonia rank
38th
Guatemala rank
41st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Estonia
  • Guatemala
-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B200020122025

How they compare

Estonia currently reports -1.72 billion against -2.03 billion in Guatemala, a difference of 311.33 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 38th and Guatemala ranks 41st of 90 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 2.09 billion -613.48 million 2.70 billion Estonia
2010s 347.04 million -877.41 million 1.22 billion Estonia
2020s -1.65 billion -1.52 billion 127.26 million Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Estonia or Guatemala?
Estonia, at -1.72 billion against -2.03 billion in Guatemala as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Estonia and Guatemala?
311.33 million, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Guatemala?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Estonia and Guatemala rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Estonia ranks 38th and Guatemala ranks 41st of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Guatemala: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/estonia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/estonia/guatemala/">Estonia vs Guatemala: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,913 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.