Georgia vs Mauritius: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Georgia
-1.34 billion
in 2025
Mauritius
-941.65 million
in 2025
Georgia rank
37th
Mauritius rank
34th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Georgia
  • Mauritius
-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0200720162025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -941.65 million against -1.34 billion in Georgia, a difference of 396.24 million.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mauritius ahead.

Georgia ranks 37th and Mauritius ranks 34th of 90 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s -331.66 million 0 331.66 million Mauritius
2010s -356.87 million -181.32 million 175.54 million Mauritius
2020s -767.83 million -727.58 million 40.25 million Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Georgia or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at -941.65 million against -1.34 billion in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Georgia and Mauritius?
396.24 million, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritius?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Mauritius rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Georgia ranks 37th and Mauritius ranks 34th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Mauritius: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/georgia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/georgia/mauritius/">Georgia vs Mauritius: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,913 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.