Lithuania vs Norway: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Lithuania
-2.99 billion
in 2025
Norway
-2.91 billion
in 2025
Lithuania rank
49th
Norway rank
46th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Lithuania
  • Norway
-20.0B-15.0B-10.0B-5.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Norway currently reports -2.91 billion against -2.99 billion in Lithuania, a difference of 84.47 million.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 49th and Norway ranks 46th of 91 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Norway Difference Ahead
2000s -564.85 million -12.53 billion 11.96 billion Lithuania
2010s -3.17 billion -1.64 billion 1.53 billion Norway
2020s -2.85 billion -2.76 billion 94.58 million Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Lithuania or Norway?
Norway, at -2.91 billion against -2.99 billion in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Lithuania and Norway?
84.47 million, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Lithuania ranks 49th and Norway ranks 46th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Norway: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/lithuania/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value/lithuania/norway/">Lithuania vs Norway: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
92 places, 1,913 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.