Argentina vs North Macedonia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Argentina
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 151.3% against 141.1% in North Macedonia, a difference of 10.2%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and North Macedonia ranks 12th of 140 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 113.2% | 103.6% | 9.5% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 138.6% | 108.2% | 30.4% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 151.3% | 141.1% | 10.2% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Argentina or North Macedonia?
- Argentina, at 151.3% against 141.1% in North Macedonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Argentina and North Macedonia?
- 10.2%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and North Macedonia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and North Macedonia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Argentina ranks 10th and North Macedonia ranks 12th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.