Bangladesh vs Malta: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Bangladesh
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 49.7% against 48.8% in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 102nd and Malta ranks 100th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.5% | 34.7% | 7.7% | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 48.8% | 49.7% | 0.9% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Bangladesh or Malta?
- Malta, at 49.7% against 48.8% in Bangladesh as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Bangladesh and Malta?
- 0.9%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Bangladesh and Malta rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Bangladesh ranks 102nd and Malta ranks 100th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.