Belarus vs Malawi: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Belarus
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 35.1% against 33.5% in Belarus, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 128th and Malawi ranks 125th of 140 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.5% | 38.2% | 1.6% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 33.5% | 35.1% | 1.6% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Belarus or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 35.1% against 33.5% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Belarus and Malawi?
- 1.6%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Malawi rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Belarus ranks 128th and Malawi ranks 125th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.