Belarus vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Belarus
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 33.5% against 32.9% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 128th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 129th of 140 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.9% | 31.7% | 13.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 37.0% | 29.0% | 8.0% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Belarus or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Belarus, at 33.5% against 32.9% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Belarus and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Belarus and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Belarus ranks 128th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 129th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.