Bolivia vs China: Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) over time
- Bolivia
- China
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 243.3% against 184.5% in China, a difference of 58.8%.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.3 times China's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 2nd and China ranks 5th of 140 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 114.6% | 57.7% | 57.0% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 249.9% | 191.9% | 57.9% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Bolivia or China?
- Bolivia, at 243.3% against 184.5% in China as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Bolivia and China?
- 58.8%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and China?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia and China rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Bolivia ranks 2nd and China ranks 5th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.