Botswana vs Uruguay: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Botswana
- Uruguay
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 60.2% against 59.8% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 140 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.6% | 56.1% | 1.5% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 60.2% | 59.8% | 0.4% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Botswana or Uruguay?
- Botswana, at 60.2% against 59.8% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Botswana and Uruguay?
- 0.4%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Uruguay rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Botswana ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.