Cambodia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Cambodia
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 54.0% against 52.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Cambodia ranks 86th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 89th of 140 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.3% | 45.1% | 5.2% | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 54.0% | 52.8% | 1.1% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Cambodia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Cambodia, at 54.0% against 52.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Cambodia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 1.2%, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Cambodia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Cambodia ranks 86th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 89th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.