Central African Republic vs Lithuania: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Central African Republic
- Lithuania
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 81.2% against 79.8% in Lithuania, a difference of 1.4%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 140 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.5% | 37.4% | 44.1% | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 81.2% | 79.8% | 1.4% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Central African Republic or Lithuania?
- Central African Republic, at 81.2% against 79.8% in Lithuania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Central African Republic and Lithuania?
- 1.4%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Central African Republic and Lithuania rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Central African Republic ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.