Central African Republic vs Slovenia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Central African Republic
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 81.7% against 81.2% in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 36th and Slovenia ranks 35th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.5% | 60.3% | 21.1% | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 81.2% | 81.7% | 0.5% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Central African Republic or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 81.7% against 81.2% in Central African Republic as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Central African Republic and Slovenia?
- 0.5%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Slovenia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Central African Republic and Slovenia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Central African Republic ranks 36th and Slovenia ranks 35th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.