Chile vs China: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Chile
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 184.5% against 171.4% in Chile, a difference of 13.1%.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 7th and China ranks 5th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 163.2% | 57.7% | 105.5% | Chile |
| 2010s | 115.2% | 188.2% | 72.9% | China |
| 2020s | 171.4% | 184.5% | 13.1% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Chile or China?
- China, at 184.5% against 171.4% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Chile and China?
- 13.1%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and China?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Chile and China rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Chile ranks 7th and China ranks 5th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.