Colombia vs Panama: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Colombia
- Panama
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 152.8% against 148.0% in Panama, a difference of 4.8%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.
Colombia ranks 9th and Panama ranks 11th of 140 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 118.5% | 117.3% | 1.2% | Colombia |
| 2010s | 155.6% | 118.7% | 37.0% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 152.8% | 148.0% | 4.8% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Colombia or Panama?
- Colombia, at 152.8% against 148.0% in Panama as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Colombia and Panama?
- 4.8%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Panama?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Panama rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Colombia ranks 9th and Panama ranks 11th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.