Congo vs Switzerland: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Congo
- Switzerland
How they compare
Congo currently reports 42.4% against 40.3% in Switzerland, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 115th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 140 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.4% | 42.3% | 29.1% | Congo |
| 2020s | 42.4% | 40.3% | 2.0% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Congo or Switzerland?
- Congo, at 42.4% against 40.3% in Switzerland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Congo and Switzerland?
- 2.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Switzerland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Switzerland rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Congo ranks 115th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.