Denmark vs Fiji: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Denmark
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 32.4% against 30.3% in Denmark, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 133rd and Fiji ranks 131st of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.0% | 51.5% | 3.5% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 41.3% | 46.5% | 5.2% | Fiji |
| 2020s | 30.3% | 32.4% | 2.1% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Denmark or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 32.4% against 30.3% in Denmark as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Denmark and Fiji?
- 2.1%, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Fiji?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Denmark and Fiji rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Denmark ranks 133rd and Fiji ranks 131st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.