Ecuador vs Peru: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 117.7% against 116.2% in Peru, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 16th and Peru ranks 17th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 104.3% | 95.8% | 8.5% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 143.4% | 96.7% | 46.7% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 111.5% | 119.4% | 7.9% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Ecuador or Peru?
- Ecuador, at 117.7% against 116.2% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Ecuador and Peru?
- 1.5%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and Peru ranks 17th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.