Ecuador vs Samoa: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Ecuador
117.7%
in 2019
Samoa
118.5%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
16th
Samoa rank
15th
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Ecuador
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 118.5% against 117.7% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 16th and Samoa ranks 15th of 140 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 166.8% | 44.4% | 122.4% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 110.3% | 82.1% | 28.2% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Ecuador or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 118.5% against 117.7% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Ecuador and Samoa?
- 0.8%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Samoa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Samoa rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and Samoa ranks 15th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.