Egypt vs Mozambique: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Egypt
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 107.8% against 99.0% in Egypt, a difference of 8.8%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.
Egypt ranks 21st and Mozambique ranks 19th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.9% | 54.4% | 24.5% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 97.0% | 138.2% | 41.3% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Egypt or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 107.8% against 99.0% in Egypt as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Egypt and Mozambique?
- 8.8%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mozambique?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Egypt and Mozambique rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Egypt ranks 21st and Mozambique ranks 19th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.