Egypt vs Norway: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Egypt
- Norway
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 99.0% against 95.1% in Norway, a difference of 3.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 21st and Norway ranks 24th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.5% | 73.4% | 1.9% | Norway |
| 2010s | 97.0% | 33.8% | 63.2% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Egypt or Norway?
- Egypt, at 99.0% against 95.1% in Norway as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Egypt and Norway?
- 3.9%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Norway?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Egypt and Norway rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Egypt ranks 21st and Norway ranks 24th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.